Monday, June 1, 2009

FOLLOWING THE MONEY

If there was ever any doubt in your mind that your friendly neighborhood Hippie is a complete political dork, this should eliminate it. Just for fun, I was touring around in one of my favorite sites, opensecrets.org, and searching for relevant info on campaign contributions. (how am I doing so far?) When I stumbled upon a few tasty facts.

Now, I know President Obama has said that we need to look forward and not backward, but I believe that we do need to know what the heck went wrong before we can correct it. Plus, Barack unfortunately has to play in that arena, and therefore is a little too dirty to point at someone else's hygiene. I, however, am not so burdened.

As I'm sure all of you know by now, our country has been shoveling money in every direction to stop a complete financial meltdown. The majority of the money that has been handed out has been in the form of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or as it is more commonly known, the TARP fund. This fund was created by the Bush Administration and pushed through Congress with next-to-no over site in the waning days of G.W's last term. Since then, we have seen top CEO's of the very organizations who caused this mess write themselves giant financial parachutes as the economy was speeding toward the Earth.

Out of curiosity, I decided to see who was writing big checks to the Bush campaign of 2004 long before anyone supposedly knew of our impeding doom. Guess what? The names of a lot of the top contributors match the top TARP recipients, whata surprise! Morgan Stanley leads the pack of Bush contributors and gave the G.W. Campaign $600,480.00, In second came Merrill Lynch with a tidy $580,004.00. For it's efforts, Morgan Stanley was handed the 8th largest handout from the TARP fund-$10 billion dollars. Merrill Lynch was bought out by Bank of America who then used their polluted ledger to rake in the biggest payout from TARP, $45 billion taxpayer dollars.

Now, keep in mind, this was way back in 2004 when supposedly no one knew anything of the impeding crisis.

If you want to get even more nauseous, check out the huge sums of money thrown in Bush's direction by the lobbyists for these firms. Bank of America gave $8,790,000, and Morgan Stanley gave $3,120,000.(Some money was given after the crisis began.) The average return on their investments and the investments of other financial giants? According to Opensecrets it was 258,449 percent!

After viewing some of these stats I have to come to one of two conclusions;

A) These companies knew nothing about our financial crises and this was an incredible coincidence. Or;

B) These rats knew we were in trouble and were lining up their exit plan long in advance.

A thinking person has to ask himself a question. Why would financial institutions such as Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley be the biggest contributors to the Bush Campaign if they had nothing to gain? Were they hoping for even more deregulation when they were already pulling every shady accounting scheme known to man totally unregulated? Or, were they way ahead of the curve and already planning how the government would bail them out. My guess is you know the answer, as well as you now know what a dork I really am. H.C.

3 comments:

Andre said...

This post has all the makings of a good conspiracy theory. I like it!

But I'm not so sure some of these firms actually predicted this economic meltdown. Peter Schiff (one of Ron Paul's advisors) became an instant celebrity after his predictions of an economic collapse came true. But before that, he was excoriated by EVERYBODY...businessmen and analysts alike. Frankly, I don't think anybody say any of this coming.

Instead - like any good lobbyists or business advocate - I think these firms were simply looking to scratch the President's back in return for favors down the road. Oddly for them, "down the road" came mostly during another adminstration.

Andre said...

"Frankly, I don't think anybody SAW any of this coming."

Stupid typos.

The H.C. said...

Hey Dre,
Yeah, I admit, it is a bit of a conspiracy theory. But I'm just throwing the facts out there for everyone to consider. I don't think these financial institutions had any reason to come forward publically like Schiff if they knew things were ready to collapse. Instead, I think they were simply hedging their bets so they could continue making the big money until the day it fell apart. It's like a game of Hot Potato where they made money every time the potato passed and didn't want the game to end, but were still afraid of what might happen if they got stuck with it when the music stopped. If they were hoping for "favors down the road" that weren't related to insuring themselves, what would those favors be that would warrant such heavy funding?