Monday, December 7, 2009

OF WOLVES AND MEN

Of all the political advocacy groups out there, none entertains me, or aggravates me more than PETA. They entertain me when they do dopey things like attack the American Kennel Club (AKC) for breeding dogs (and dress in KKK outfits to prove their "point"?). Don't they know that the AKC is one of the biggest groups of animal lovers in America? They aggravate me when they get involved with things like hunting or fishing (which they know nothing about) and try to influence policy based on nothing more than emotion. Such is the case with Wolves.

As a hunter, I view the wolf as my brother. He is both cunning and shrewd, sleek and majestic. He is at the same time beautiful and yet dangerous. To hear his howl in the dark of the night is to know that you are not alone in the woods. It's a sound that makes every hair on your neck stand straight up and it rates right up there with an elk bugling as one of the greatest sounds nature has to offer. He epitomizes freedom and represents everything I know about the Spirit of the Wild and the balance of nature. Unfortunately though, he is not in balance, because he lives in a world overrun by humans-his biggest competitor.


Once the Gray Wolf, and several other North American wolf species lived unspoiled and in harmony with the Native Americans, the only humans here at the time. But that changed with the invasion of the white man. With his fear of wolves, man slayed the beasts to a point where they were nearly extinct. As we matured as hunters, we began to realize the value of our brother and his place in the wild. Efforts were made to reintroduce the Gray and Timber Wolf in places like Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and Yellowstone National Park. Those efforts have been very successful. In the Southwest, in Arizona and New Mexico the Mexican Gray Wolf has been reintroduced successfully too.


However these successes have not been without problems. As you may remember from your old Nursery stories, Wolves like sheep, and calves, and any other livestock that they can get their hands on. Ranchers and wolves are running into each other more and more. In New Mexico ranchers are being driven out of a business they have been in for generations because of repeated wolf kills. In Yellowstone, wolf packs leave the park at night to prey on neighboring ranches. In Michigan's Upper Peninsula, Wisconsin and Minnesota hunters are complaining that wolves are killing too many deer-destroying what was once a thriving deer hunting industry. The problem is, the wolves are a victim of their own success. Numbers in all those states are now passing their targets and management, by hunting, is the only answer.


Unfortunately, hunting is never the answer to nutty groups who deal in emotion and watch Animal Planet far too much. Hunting groups have fought long and hard along with ranchers to get the Gray Wolf removed from the Endangered Species List. The other side is fighting hard to keep them there. Remember, their numbers are surpassing the targets set by the states as sustainable. Groups such as the Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, The Humane Society of the United States, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, Friends of the Clearwater, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Oregon Wild, Cascadia Wildlands, Western Watersheds Project, Wildlands Network, and Hells Canyon Preservation Council, PETA and a host of others are fighting every effort to cull the out-of-control numbers of wolves.


Here is the low-down on why they are wrong.


Animals need to be controlled in order for them to live side-by-side with humans. Predators lose their fear of humans with time and become a problem. The days of endless forests for them to run unaffected in balance are gone. Human invasion is everywhere and bound to get even worse with time. The idea of returning the major predators to their "rightful place" in the food chain is a pipe dream at best. Man is the ultimate predator and effects everything he touches with his manipulation of the environment. The only way to return things to the way it was before man, is to get rid of man. Since I don't think that mankind is going to be leaving the U.S. any time soon, we can only hope to find a way to live together. Man's livestock, garbage, pets and even children can become easy targets for a major predator.


Colorado experimented with putting an end to running bears with dogs during hunting seasons, the end result? Bears that no longer feared dogs and wandered right into towns. This put both bears and people in danger. Large cats like the mountain lions are showing similar boldness. Without the fear put into them by the hunters with their dogs, they decided that house cats and small dogs chained to a tree were easy prey.


Wolves are quick studies. They learn really quick where danger is or isn't. Ranchers allowed to shoot a wolf will rarely see that pack again. I can appreciate the animal -lovers and their fondness for the animals we both respect. The problem is they see only beauty and good in animals like the wolf and none of the problems. In order for us to live in harmony, it is necessary for the true stewards of the forests, the hunters, to do their job and keep the wolf as he should be-wild, wary and afraid of humans. PETA and their ilk try to attach human emotions to an animal and the wolf simply looks a little too much like Lassie for them to accept a culling hunt. None of that is built on research or science-it's just emotion. In order for the U.S. to have a thriving environment with sustainable numbers of the wildlife that we all enjoy seeing, we have to make a decision. Do we trust the people who rely on research, science, their experiences in the wild, along with their own desire to see the animals they love to hunt? Or do we trust people who get their information from T.V. shows and from petting animals in a petting zoo? I think you know the answer. H.C.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

"I think you know the answer.."

Of course, it's whomever controls the conversation/agenda in the media, the congress, the schools, and the churches.

Hunters are pyorrhea to most, if not all, of them. Anything hunters say, no matter how logical and well founded in either science, conservation, or history, has zero influence. To them we are just a bunch of gun nuts, seal clubbers, and heathens. Guilty as charged, and beyond redemption.

On a side note, it's pathetic how a number of these self proclaimed animal rights activist, have no problem chaining Fido to a stake in their unshaded yard for hours on end.

I put animal abusers in a category right next to child abusers: I pray there is a special place in hell for them. And, like I've replied in the past, I'm more than willing to send them there if this pansy ass state would ever adopt the death penalty.

The H.C. said...

Hey Hack,
I don't think anyone could ever accuse you of not being passionate enough-which I love! Apathy, not passion, will be our undoing. As you can see, I'm trying to do my best to improve our (hunter's) image. People like you and me, along with a lot of other intelligent hunters can turn this madness around. The great thing about this debate is; we're right and we can prove it with science and research. The biggest flaw in the other side's argument is that it is centered on removing the apex predator from the mix. For the past 4 million years we humans have sat at the top of the food chain. For them to believe that "balance" is accomplishable without considering the main player is theoretic and flawed in it's design. We are the only predator that considers the condition and environment of it's prey and adjusts it to the prey's benefit. Conservation and stewardship is the answer along with the enormous funds we generate. Animal activists will be far easier, and far less funded for developers to push around. After we're gone (which I refuse to allow to happen), you can all kiss your state lands good-bye. I agree with you whole-heartedly on your statement on animal abusers. I have owned several dogs and cried when every one of them passed. People have a hard time understanding that seeming contradiction. Hunter/Animal Lover. But I deliver as clean a kill as I can possibly deliver, which is nearly always more humane than nature's. I, nor any of my hunting companions, ever disrespect the animals we hunt. "The hunter that diminishes his prey, diminishes himself." I have always said that the day I don't feel a little sad at the death of my prey will be the day I quit hunting. However, I am a predator, and I understand my role in nature. Thanks for your thoughts.

The H.C. said...

@Andre,
SAVE THE T-REX!!! LOL. Sometimes I think we're the only predators that PETA doesn't like. How did you like their AKC=KKK comparison? Could these people be any weirder?

heiresschild said...

first, H.C., what a great article! i've received so much knowledge and enlightenment in just a few minutes. it must have taken you some time to do research on this, so thank you.

second, i only had to look up 1 word in this article and 1 word in the "paradox" article above, so either you're breaking your words down a little more, or i'm getting smarter (i'd like to think the latter, lol).

i'm reminded of in the Bible that man was given dominion over all of the animals, fowl, fish, birds, etc. another part of the Bible says how one day the lion will lie down with the lamb; however, man will still be the dominant figure. Jesus always talks about wolves in sheeps' clothing, so even then we see the cunningness and deception of the animal.

perhaps PETA has their good points (if so, i'm still not aware of them), but i hate how they declare to love animals so much, but will quickly toss paint or blood on someone who's wearing fur--love for animals, but disregard for humans.

even in the suburbs and rural areas of where i live, with the constant tearing down of trees, and building up of apts, townhomes, malls, etc., i've seen animals up close that i've never seen except on tv or in the zoo. we have a family of foxes a couple of blocks over who wander out and will stare you down.

yep, i know the answer, and i'm in complete agreement with those who know the wild.

heiresschild said...

oh, and one more thing for PETA, in the words of sarah palin, "we eat, therefore we hunt"

The H.C. said...

Hi Heiress,
Sorry it took so long to respond.

Thank you and I think you were smart to begin with, I just tend to be fascinated with word play. Maybe it's because I write music and have always been interested in lyrics. Or maybe I'm just trying to compensate for my 9th grade education.

I think PETA actually has one good point that I'm aware of-they make me laugh with their antics. Comparing the AKC to the KKK? It's so ridiculous you can't help but laugh.

I agree with you completely on your biblical stance. Even though I'm not religious (although my sister claims I'm a religious person without a religion) I find the bible to be dead-on on a lot of the social issues of our time. It's too bad more people don't look to it for guidance. Thanks for supporting hunters, I feel we've done a pretty good job since the advent of conservation.

P.S. Does Andre know your quoting Sarah Palin? (lol)