Today the Bush Administration released a list of 14 people who would be the recipients of a Presidential Pardon from George W. Bush. Including these pardons, he has now granted a total of 171 pardons and eight commutations. Conveniently, this list was release at the same time that every journalist was covering Barack Obama's announcement that his new economic team would include Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers. Yes, the same Larry Summers that I wrote about a while back who lost his job as Harvard's President because he had the nerve to suggest that women might just not be interested in becoming engineers. That infuriated the leftists at Harvard who demanded, and got, his resignation. Despite that, it appears Obama is unconcerned that the press will make an issue of his appointing a known sexist. My guess is that he's right, since the press always seems to be far more forgiving to the Dems for acts of racism or sexism. But back to Bush.
Bush's pardons so far are in line with the usual lame duck pardons. A bunch of rich people, a bunch of well connected people. Each has fought long and hard to make their way on to the list. Whether it's Republicans or Democrats doing the pardoning, you can rest assured that each pardon is represented by sizable donations to the President's campaign or his soon to be constructed Presidential library. Clinton pardoned domestic terrorists along with an assortment of white collar criminals and drug dealers and George H.W. Bush pardoned his Iran-Contra buddies and a long list of white collar criminals, both sides abuse this loophole terribly. Among Bush's recent pardons were for 3 people who committed various types of bank fraud, a women who committed medical insurance fraud, a couple of drug dealers and even a killer of bald eagles.
So how do we stop this abuse of power?
First, there should be no lame duck pardons at all! All pardons should be given out before Oct. 1 of their last year in office. That way the press has time to publish all their pardons and let the voters take it out on their candidate or party. This system of allowing criminals to buy or barter their way out of their convictions through lobbyists or personal connections is a form of nepotism and elitism that we should all be trying to limit in our government. Government is a service to one's country, not a position of power to shield one's friends and relatives. Presidents, Senators, House Representatives and Governors all abuse this power for their own benefit and it's time to make it so that it's also at their own peril. Justice can never be completely equal, but it is what we should all strive for. H.C.
4 comments:
The pardons Clinton made on his exit was the single reason why I began paying attention to politics. I remember being absolutely disgusted, shocked, & angry that not only could this occur, but that it has been all along. The jury is still out on whether I'm thankful for the wake-up call, or as Andre might say, regret not taking the blue pill.
I'd be curious to learn what the provision/loop-hole/law/whatever that allows this is exactly, & what it's original intentions were.
-n
Hey Nic,
"The pardons Clinton made on his exit was the single reason why I began paying attention to politics."
Interesting. For me it was the S&L Scandal, but notice how it was abuse of power that got us both started. Clinton is famous for doing his shady pardons in his last 48 hours.
As far as the power of pardon, it was granted in the Articles of the Constitution in Article 2 Section 2, it reads as follows;
"The President, furthermore, may grant pardon or reprieves, except in cases of impeachment."
There was an interesting debate around the time of Nixon's impending impeachment on whether or not he could pardon himself preemptively. It seems to me clear that he could not, but might have been able to pardon himself for any crimes he may have committed prior to being impeached.
I have to believe that our Founding Fathers didn't intend for this power to be used to build Presidential Libraries or to release criminals who just happen to know somebody who knows somebody. When I die and go to Heaven (If there's such a place) I'm going to ask one of them. Thanks for your thoughts.
I like that idea of the pardons coming at a time where the president will actually face his detractors rather than just slinking away unscathed. It's kinda like if I were to take a shit on your living room carpet when nobody is home and leave. Whereas if your dog took a shit on your living room carpet they have no thumbs to open doors and no ability to escape so they'd have to deal with the consequences.
It's time to rub politicians noses in their own own shit. Bad Dog!!
Hey Tabor,
Thanks, I like the idea too. Let them pay for their sins at the voting booth.I like your anology too, they are indeed "Bad Dogs"
Post a Comment