Arson at Sarah Palin's church
For reasons that I am unable to fully understand, people on the left side of the political spectrum hate Sarah Palin beyond words. I find this odd because Sarah hasn't, to the best of my knowledge, done anything to any of them except have a point of view, culture and lifestyle that is different from their own. The supposedly tolerant left can't seem to control themselves from attacking her children, her hometown, her looks and even her accent. However, it now appears to have reached a brand new level, when someone, or several someones, burned down the Wasilla Bible Church in Alaska. Authorities believe it may be connected to the church's outreach program for homosexuals that has been recently criticized by several Gay organizations. Governor Palin herself has apologized to the church and people of Wasilla for bringing this vile hatred back home from the lower 48. Move over KKK, it appears you now have some competition on the left.
Bush swings open the border
In the middle of the night G.W. gave a parting kiss to farmers across the country. Bush rewrote the rules for immigrant farm hands in a way the makes it easier for farmers to get low wage workers without having to prove that they at least tried to get labor through conventional means. Bruce Goldstein of the advocate group Farmworker Justice had this to say, "The changes in the posted version would drop a requirement that an employer get the Labor Department to certify it faces a worker shortage before it can get visas for foreign workers; instead, employers would be allowed to simply attest in writing to a shortage. That version of the new rule also would change the method for calculating wage minimums for workers and relieve employers of a requirement to recruit in states or communities where other employers already are hiring farm workers." With the GOP fighting for cheap labor and the DNC fighting for the illegal vote, soon we won't have to ship jobs overseas to lose them.
Riots across Europe
One of the many reasons that I oppose Socialism is that it doesn't absorb hard times very well (due to the majority of the jobs being public) and instills in it's populous the inability to function without the government holding their hands. I call these people "Bridge Sitters" after the people stranded on the infamous bridge in New Orleans waiting for the government to save them. An unfortunate result of disappointed "Bridge Sitters" is that they blame the government for not solving every problem in life that they face. Self reliant people are far better at surviving hard times since they immediately go about helping themselves and others. This is now playing itself out in several European countries as the bad economy spreads. As more and more people lose their jobs, and with no other job source to turn to, angry youths are hitting the streets to vent on their "parent". The government's only option is to create work programs funded by printing money. Any first year economics student will tell you that only leads to devaluing your currency and hyper-inflation. The riots started in Greece but have now spread to France, Germany, Spain, Denmark and Italy. This could turn into a far bigger story later.
Lending money to fools
Lastly, but not least, is the story of a swindler of epic proportions. Wall Street money manager Bernard Madoff's ponzi scheme is being pretty well covered by the mainstream media. Mr. Madoff managed to run off with over 50 billion dollars of investors money. That's 50 Billion with a "B". What wasn't, and isn't, being covered is who was among the burned. J. Ezra Merkin, GMAC chairman. That's right, the chairman of the financial arm of General Motors Corporation that is, as we speak, begging for taxpayer money. Is it too much to ask that before we bail out these losers, they at least shed people that fall for one of the oldest schemes known to man? It's easy to see why this isn't being well publicized. Who would give more money to people who can't even be trusted to hold on to what they have? What's next, we cover their track losses too?
Well, that's it for now. Maybe this helps explain why I walk around mumbling to myself a lot lately. H.C.
7 comments:
Just one thought HC. You do realize that those so-called "bridge sitters" were turned back at gunpoint by sheriff's deputies who were determined not to let "those people" into "their town"?
Hey Malik,
I don't hold any animosity toward any of the people who were on any of the bridges or any of the people who suffered greatly in New Orleans. It's the philosophy of "The Government Will Save Me" that I'm opposed to. For instance, Mayor Nagin said he couldn't use the school buses because their wasn't anyone to drive them. Why weren't people volunteering to drive them? One man took a boat and was responsible for saving dozens of people with no one telling him to or the government paying him to. That's what I'm talking about.I've looked into a lot of what happened in New Orleans and it's very hard to separate truth from urban legend. I couldn't find the reference that you made to "those people" or "their town". Can you give me a site? Again, it's a philosophy that I'm opposed to, I'm not condemning people who lost their homes and were only reacting in the way their government had conditioned them to. Thanks for your thoughts!
With regard to Mayor Nagin, let's just say his explanations seem implausible to me and leave it at that.
As for the gunpoint incident:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/racist-police-blocked-bridge-and-forced-evacuees-back-at-gunpoint-506371.html
If you want to see firsthand accounts of how Katrina evacuees reacted to their situation, I would recommend the documentary "When the Levees Broke". It's balanced and well-crafted, and includes reactions from affected individuals throughout the gulf coast, not just New Orleans.
Dag. I should've copywrited the random news joints. I could be collecting royalties each time you decide to do one these.
Anyway, to address your stories:
(1) If the fire was indeed caused by a leftist group, this only provides further evidence that extreme leftists are every bit as dangerous as the righties. Still, when leftists attack, I have to give them so credit for not making human targets apart of their plans. I certainly don't want to discount the damage they can cause, but I also don't want to place as high of a premium on infrastructure as I would on human life. If extremists on the right had their say, they'd burn down Trinity United with Rev. Wright tied to the pulpit.
On a related note, I find it pretty interesting that Gov. Palin is willing to accept responsibility for the negativity that may have led to the church being burned, but not for the negativity that cost them the election. I thought she dipped from the same negativity pot.
(2) With Mike Chertoff having a (no pun intended) boatload of aliens working for him, its no wonder Bush is doing all he can -- or can't -- to protect certain interests. If Congress is wise, I don't think they'll let this slide. Unfortunately for us, them, and the host of illegals who stand to get the shaft, Congress is too occupied with all this bailout noise to pay closer attention to what Dubya's doing.
(3) "Self reliant people are far better at surviving hard times since they immediately go about helping themselves and others."
Are you sure?
If we're using capitalism as the anti-Socialism model for success, we might have to find a new mascot. For all of its good, capitalism is still a product of greed and personal avarice (quite the opposite of a socialist system ran at its best). After all that noise about private and corporate ownership, the "parent" government still has to step in and save the day.
Handouts don't work. But the free market is no walk in the park either.
(4) As I've said before, I've got zero sympathy for executives who run companies and themselves into the ground. My concern is - and always has been - for the working class arm of these companies; not for the folks most benefitting from this fallacious system of "Meritocracy".
"copyrighted"
Hey Malik,
There are apparently several bridges in New Orleans. The Danzinger Bridge was the one that drew my attention due to the resulting shootings and the media attention that surrounded it. The site you gave me was in reference to the Crescent Connection Bridge. On that one I can only say "absolutely disgusting". The people of Gretna should be ashamed of themselves and wonder if they would have thought it was right if the situation was reversed. Thanks for the reference-well done! I believe I've already seen the Documentary, I'm not sure, I've watched several. Thanks again for your input.
Hey Dre,
"Still, when leftists attack, I have to give them so credit for not making human targets apart of their plans."
Actually, there was a small group of people in the church at the time. Fortunately, no one was hurt though. I can give you a whole bunch of examples of Leftists killing or endangering people if you want them. I think your giving them too much credit, I don't think they value the life of abortion protestors any more than the Right values abortion providers. If you hate someone enough (which is why I try to avoid hating anyone for their views) it becomes easy to dehumanize them. I believe that is demonstrated on both sides. Look at how many people on the left celebrated Tony Snow's death or Cheney's heart attack.
"For all of its good, capitalism is still a product of greed and personal avarice."
Absolutely, that's why I compare CEO's to dictators. Just like a dictator, they rule their domain and destroy people to get and stay on top. They also both hate when someone outside their domain trys to assert rules on them and do everything in their power to avoid being controlled in any fashion. Tough regulation and harsh penalties is needed to control either of them. However on your other point "socialist system ran at its best" still can't handle reducing it's outlay to it's people because they feel entitled and will react as if they have been wronged. Capitalism, even with all it's faults, is a more diversified economy and absorbs downturns better. A well regulated Capitalist economy is the best answer in my eyes but I don't think we've ever seen it regulated in a way that would make me happy. Strong labor (with good unions and an NRLB that is unbias) balanced with good and fair bargaining could be mutually beneficial to both the upper class and the lower. The destruction of the upper class out of spite and jealousy through Socialism won't benefit anyone in the long run IMO. "Socialism is a form of government that consumes it's own assets"
Post a Comment