With this in mind, I'm going to share a story that was told to me by an old man. I have no idea if it's true or not, but it makes a good point and might make some of you understand a little better the thinking of people who don't want the government over extending it's reach.
A man lived in a house with his wife and two kids. They were a proud bunch who never asked for anything or expected anything. He worked as a hobby farmer for food and repaired things for money. His wife stayed at home and made crafts for her extra money. His kids were home-schooled and well behaved. In short, despite their hardships and poverty, they were quite happy.
One day the well ran dry and the family was too poor to replace it. Without much verifiable income, the bank turned down his loan. Out of desperation, he turned to the government for help.
Before the government would put in the well, they needed to inspect the property and the proud man did something he never wanted to do-he let the government into his life. The inspector noticed the squaller of the poor family, and out of sympathy turned his case over to a Social Worker. The Social Worker went to the house and decreed it unfit to live in, what with no water, bad wiring and plumbing. They moved the man and his family, under great protest, into a temporary housing nearby. The kids were interviewed for possible abuse and it was discovered that although they knew math, English and writing beyond their years, they knew nothing of the oppressive history of Native Americans, women or African Americans. They were ordered by a court to be enrolled in the local school to complete their education. The teachers there were surprised to meet people in their own community so isolated. They were even more appalled to find that the woman of the house had very little schooling and had never held a job. They took her under their wing and got her employment working for the school cafeteria.
The man of the house had a much harder time. The IRS wanted to know how he had managed to claim so little income. He was confused as to how much he was making, since a great deal of his payment came in trade services and bartering. Other people started accusing him of abusing his wife by not allowing her to work even though they both thought she did-at home. They accused him of abusing his children by not allowing them a "proper" education, even though he thought he did. They accused him of neglecting his family by not giving them a proper house to live in, even though they all loved their little house. Soon the press caught wind of the story and ran pictures of the families run down shack that they had lived happily in for so many years. The people of the community were shocked at the loose animals, old plow and traditional farm life style. Soon outrage turned to an arrest based on trumped up charges. The simple man defended himself as best he could in a system he didn't understand. The sentence was handed down and the man found himself in prison. Soon his wife stopped coming to see him and his children were told not to contact him. They had started their new life with their new friends who had "saved" them from their past 'horrible' life.
One day the simple man got out of prison for the crimes he didn't even know he committed. He walked up the long dirt road to his empty house now posted with "condemned" signs. He sat on the poach and began to cry uncontrollably. he cursed the day he tried to do the one thing he never, ever wanted to do, ask for help. In the darkness of that moment, he remembered the irony of that day when a man came to his house and proudly said, "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
This is the problem many of you have with our current health care debate. In your effort to "help", you are failing to understand. There are people all over the U.S. that do not think that you are "helping" by bringing the government into their lives. In fact, they think you are doing exactly what happened to the man in the story. We have millions of people who desperately need our help, but in that process, let us not forget that there are many more millions that do not want your "help". Someone once told me, "God gave us two ears and only one mouth so we would listen twice as much as we talk." If we truly want to help those that need it, we need the support of those that don't. Maybe the best way to get that support, is to listen. H.C.
7 comments:
'I'm from the Guvment, and I'm here to help....'
How about some other Great lies told by the Guvment and a few other large entities:
'If you like your present insurance plan, you can keep it...'
'Clincal testing has shown no adverse side effects...'
'No tax increase on the middle class (WTF is 'the middle class anyway?)...'
'The Dreamliner will fly by December..'
'I did not have sex with that woman...'
'Windows 7 will ship in September...'
'In five years, you'll be blown away...'
Hey Hack,
Great examples. Although I would argue that the last one was kept. I'm blown away by how badly she's run this state. Why do we keep believing things that all the evidence points out won't be true? The Congressional Budget Office, for example, NEVER gets their estimates even close to reality, but we still quote them like they have some validity. Sigh, I guess Paul Simon was right when he said, A man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest."
One of the greates 'scams' in recent Michigan politics is how both the Repubs and Dems managed to keep the budget situation under wraps during the last election cycle. Gee, we're out of money. What a surprise.... Full time legislature and they don't know the well is running dry.
Right...
The government and its bureacratic way of getting things done doesn't work. I get it. But unless people with illness too unaffordable to cure can somehow get up, get a Ph.D. in biology, and cure themselves, what alternatives does a person have?
I agree with your long-held belief that people need to stop relying solely on the government (especially when it gets to the point where people are lazily leaning on the government instead of relying on their own steam). Too much government accessibility is a breeding ground for the exploitation of programs and services. I get that.
But for every case of unnecessary reliance on the guv'ment, there is a case where a person's last line of defense against greedy corporate interests may lie in the government's ability to intervene (God help us!!!). I'm not a fan of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Then again, that's probably why I'm not an elected official.
Hey Dre,
Absolutely, Unlike my Libetarian friends, (and even some Conservatives)I recognize that government DOES have a role. My belief is that government is the representation of the people that counters the power of big corporations. To assume a "hands off" approach would allow equal access to success is a misnomer (IMO). Power will solidify it's own power left alone. It's in the individual that I feel the government exercises too much intrusion. Example; I built my own house w/ some help from friends. Mostly though, I was there by my self day to day. I had SEVEN inspectors looking over the shoulder of ONE man working! I mean, come on, is the really necessary??? I have said here before, and I'll say it again, we have yet to try WELL-REGULATED Capitalism on the Corporate front. Which I believe would be the best system im the world. As for the individual and his/her family, the government's role (again IMO) is to EDUCATE, not to DICTATE! Health Care Reform should follow these principles.
"The government and its bureacratic way of getting things done doesn't work. I get it. But unless people with illness too unaffordable to cure can somehow get up, get a Ph.D. in biology, and cure themselves, what alternatives does a person have?"
I believe the term is 'inherently governmental' when anyone refers to services, programs and projects that are of such large scope and expense that states, corporations, or individuals cannot fund them without the seemingly endless supply of money or other resources available to guvments.
Highways, dams, bridges, etc. Most large infrastructure projects could not be done without government backing. Same with National Defense.
Although I have strong Libertarian leanings (I like to think of myself as a Capitalist/Conservative/Libertarian), I do believe there is a place for EFFECTIVE government in those and similar areas. However the Feds move with the nimbleness of an aircraft carrier, not a 16' runabout.
Unfortunately, Over the (near) sixty years I've been around, I've seen the Guvment try to become my owner, and not my employee.
(Disclosure: I retired with 30 years federal guvment time)
Hey Hack,
I love your statement;
"Unfortunately, Over the (near) sixty years I've been around, I've seen the Guvment try to become my owner, and not my employee."
It reminds me of one of my favorite quotes;
"When the government fears the people, that is LIBERTY. When people fear the government, that is TYRANNY."
Post a Comment